The screen locates that the disputed domain name is basically identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark GUINNESS

The screen locates that the disputed domain name is basically identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark GUINNESS

“The Complainant provides http://www.datingrating.net/nl/fitness-singles-overzicht licensed the domain . This domain name are the same as Complainant’s tradee adds the universal top-level-domain “” and (2) the removal for the page “s”.

“The reduction of the page “s” between “guinnes” and “Guinness” doesn’t considerably affect the visual impact created by the website name than the mark, and will not affect the pronunciation in the website name as compared with the e are similar or confusingly like a signature or solution tag wherein the Claimant has before special legal rights.”

In the event it happened to be, the section would find utilize neither legitimate nor fair

Part 4(c) in the plan outlines, without restriction, situations which, if proven, determine a registrant’s rights or legitimate passions to a disputed domain. The Complainant contains the onus of evidence with this, because on all problem.

Without disputing the fame associated with Complainant’s elizabeth GUINNESS relating to her trading tasks, being cast question upon the universality of these fame

The Respondent has never asserted that he’s also known of the disputed domain name and contains offered no reason of his choice of that identity. Dramatically, the Respondent has not yet asserted he was unaware of the Complainant’s e. He has perhaps not declined he recognized towards Complainant’s solicitors that many people went to his webpages properly considering the existence of the phrase “guiness”. Continue reading “The screen locates that the disputed domain name is basically identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark GUINNESS”